Disclaimer:
The information presented here is strictly for informational and analytical purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice, financial advice, or a recommendation to place any wagers. All insights and predictions are based on data analysis and do not guarantee any outcomes. Please gamble responsibly and consult a professional advisor if you need financial guidance.


Brandon Moreno
Former champion, elite scrambler with high-volume boxing, strong cardio, and five-round composure. Durable, adaptive mid-fight, and experienced against elite pressure and grappling threats. Not explosive early, but thrives in chaos exchanges and championship pace.
Lone’er Kavanagh
Undefeated prospect with speed, sharp straight punches, and confident counter-timing. Athletic, explosive early, carries real knockout threat in Round 1–2. Less proven in deep waters and extended grappling scrambles.
Moreno holds major edge in championship rounds.
Veteran Strategy Bonus applies.
Aging Curve Technical Fighter Exception softens decline penalty (skill-based longevity).
Kavanagh lacks proven five-round durability → Adversity Response Coefficient risk.
Kavanagh likely faster early, sharper in straight-line speed.
However, Moreno’s durability integrity remains high.
Early Chaos Reweighting v2 adds early KO volatility but not enough to flip edge.
Moreno’s wrestling entries are layered (feints → level change → scrambles).
EVG validated.
Kavanagh has not proven high-level scramble resistance → Scramble Resistance Coefficient risk.
If Moreno secures extended control segments (>30s), judging optics favor him.
Kavanagh must land visible damage to offset.
Moreno cuts cage well; not linear pressure.
Kavanagh more reactive striker; could concede rounds if output dips.
Early KO window: moderate.
Post Round 2: volatility drops significantly.
Five-round pacing favors Moreno heavily.
Volatility Score: 0.53 (inside official pick threshold)
Brandon Moreno 64% - Lone’er Kavanagh 36%
Most likely outcome:
Brandon Moreno by decision
Five-round cardio advantage
Superior scramble depth
Proven composure under elite pressure
Tactical adaptability
Strong durability trend (no recent DIC triggers)
Early Round 1–2 KO via straight right or reactive counter
Capitalizing on slow start (SSA risk)
High-tempo burst before Moreno settles
Estimated early KO equity: ~22–25%
This stays above 60% threshold with acceptable volatility. Not a lock, but structurally sound veteran edge.


Marlon “Chito” Vera
Durable, methodical counter-striker with dangerous kicking game and opportunistic submissions. Historically a slow starter but extremely tough, proven over five rounds, and capable of late damage swings. Relies on reads and durability rather than pace dominance.
David Martinez
Aggressive, high-output striker with sharp boxing combinations and early pressure. Carries real knockout threat and fights with urgency. Less proven against elite-tier durability and five-round composure.
Vera benefits from VTO in close rounds due to optics, composure, and damage timing.
However, PVTR and Enhanced Urgency Index penalize slow starts if he concedes first two rounds cleanly.
This is a key tension variable.
Vera absorbs shots early while downloading data. If Martinez lands clean volume early, SDI penalty slightly increases Vera’s volatility exposure.
Explosive pressure striker vs compact counter-striker → early KO equity boosted for Martinez.
This increases Round 1–2 finish probability.
Vera historically extremely durable. No recent KO fragility flags.
Martinez durability against elite power not fully tested → mild uncertainty volatility.
Martinez must demonstrate cage-cutting and layered entries. If pressure is linear, Vera’s counter timing and knees up the middle become dangerous.
Vera approaching mid-30s, but qualifies for Aging Curve Technical Fighter Exception — durability + timing still intact. No heavy acceleration penalty.
Round 1: Martinez faster, higher output.
Round 2: Competitive — Vera reads patterns.
Round 3: Momentum shifts toward Vera if he survives cleanly.
If Martinez fails to hurt Vera early, probability shifts dramatically toward decision equity for Vera.
Marlon Vera 58% - David Martinez 42%
Most likely outcome:
Marlon Vera by decision
Volatility Score: 0.59
This sits just outside “official pick” threshold due to early KO risk.
Classification: Lean, not high-confidence official play.
Early knockdown within first 6–8 minutes
Sustained pressure preventing Vera’s timing reads
Avoiding prolonged clinch or grappling exchanges
Estimated early KO equity: ~28–30%
Structurally, veteran durability + decision optics edge slightly favor Vera.
However, early chaos risk is real. If betting market pushes Martinez too wide as dog, live underdog opportunity exists.


Daniel Zellhuber
Tall, rangy lightweight with sharp straight punches, improving composure, and better round-to-round adjustments in recent fights. Uses distance well and has shown growth in output consistency. Still somewhat hittable in exchanges if pressured recklessly.
King Green
Veteran defensive boxer with shoulder-roll style, strong counter timing, and rhythm control. Historically low output at times, but difficult to hit cleanly. Relies on optics, craft, and experience rather than pace dominance or finishing power.
Green benefits from VTO in close rounds due to optics and craft.
However, PVTR triggers if he relies too heavily on low output and defensive shell without proactive scoring.
If Green gives away minutes early, decision equity declines sharply.
Zellhuber’s length advantage is significant.
RCE applies if:
He maintains jab authority
Keeps exchanges at long range
Avoids overcommitting into counters
This is a structural edge.
Green thrives when opponents overextend.
Zellhuber must avoid emotional exchanges or chasing finishes. If he stays disciplined, CDS risk is minimal.
Green has accumulated mileage and damage over career.
Veteran Durability Regression Flag (VDRF) slightly increases volatility against younger volume strikers.
Zellhuber durability solid but not iron-chin tier.
Green’s output often fluctuates.
If Zellhuber maintains steady volume, CDW+ favors the younger fighter in judging optics.
Zellhuber likely faster and longer at this stage of Green’s career.
PPA increases his finish probability slightly, especially late if Green slows.
Round 1: Green competitive, sharp counters.
Round 2: Zellhuber volume advantage becomes clearer.
Round 3: Youth and pace tilt rounds if fight remains at distance.
Key variable: Does Zellhuber overcommit and get countered clean?
Daniel Zellhuber 66% - King Green 34%
Most likely outcome:
Daniel Zellhuber by decision
Volatility Score: 0.50
Within official pick threshold.
Disrupting rhythm early
Drawing Zellhuber into pocket exchanges
Winning optics with cleaner counters in low-volume rounds
Decision upset equity ~25–28%
KO equity low unless defensive lapse occurs.
Youth + range + volume + declining veteran durability trend give Zellhuber a structural edge.
If market undervalues Green due to age narrative, small hedge possible — but structurally this favors Zellhuber.


Edgar Chairez
Aggressive flyweight with strong guillotine/front-choke threat and willingness to engage in scrambles. Pushes pace early, but entries can be reactive and sometimes linear. Defensive composure under sustained pressure still developing.
Felipe Bunes
Brazilian grappler with smooth transitions and active submission chains. More methodical than explosive; looks to capitalize on scrambles rather than forcing chaos. Less proven in prolonged striking exchanges.
Both fighters show early submission equity.
Chairez has strong R1 choke attempts; Bunes carries opportunistic submission threat if scrambles occur.
This increases early-round volatility.
Chairez has shown moments of overcommitment in grappling exchanges.
If Bunes survives initial blitz, reversal/submission exposure becomes real.
Chairez’s entries can be aggressive but not always layered.
If he shoots without setup, Predictable Entry Penalty (PEP) and counter-grapple risk apply.
Bunes tends to chain rather than shoot naked → slightly better EVG validation.
Not applicable (men’s bout), but scramble volatility logic still increases submission probability in R1–2.
At flyweight, control optics often win rounds unless visible damage occurs.
If Bunes establishes top control without getting caught in guillotine traps, judging bias favors him.
Chairez’s pace can dip after high R1 output.
If R1 scramble-heavy, R2–3 equity shifts toward the more composed grappler.
Round 1: High scramble volatility. Either man could lock a choke.
Round 2: If fight continues, Bunes gains structural edge through cleaner transitions.
Round 3: Decision equity favors the fighter who conserved energy early — slight lean Bunes.
Key variable: Does Chairez finish early, or gas from failed attempts?
Felipe Bunes 57% - Edgar Chairez 43%
Most likely outcome:
Felipe Bunes by submission or decision
Volatility Score: 0.64
This exceeds official pick confidence threshold.
Classification: Lean — high early chaos risk.
R1 guillotine or front choke during entry exchange
Fast scramble leading to neck exposure
Catching Bunes before grappling settles
Estimated early submission equity: ~30%
Structurally, Bunes has slightly cleaner grappling process and better long-fight equity.
However, this is a high-variance flyweight scramble matchup — not a strong official pick.


Imanol Rodríguez
Young flyweight with aggressive forward pressure, solid grappling instincts, and willingness to initiate scrambles. Tends to fight emotionally at times, can overextend in exchanges, but brings urgency and pace.
Kevin Borjas
Explosive, athletic striker with real early-round power for the division. Fast hands, dangerous counters, and high first-round knockout equity. Less proven in deep grappling exchanges and extended round 2–3 pace battles.
Borjas has explosive tools but must prove composure under sustained UFC-level pressure.
Rodríguez benefits from CUT if he can turn fight into layered scrambles rather than striking duel.
Explosive striker vs pressure grappler → early KO equity boosted for Borjas.
Round 1 volatility elevated significantly.
Rodríguez must show layered entries. If he shoots linearly from range,
→ Predictive Counterstrike Risk (PCR emphasis)
→ Early KO volatility increases sharply.
This is the biggest structural risk in the fight.
If Rodríguez secures repeated takedowns with 30+ seconds control in R1, model shifts quickly toward decision equity.
If Borjas punishes entries early, CDW shifts to striker.
Borjas historically more explosive than pace-driven.
If fight enters R2–3 at high tempo, Rodríguez’s pressure durability may carry edge.
Neither shows severe fragility flags. However:
Borjas’ aggressive style increases chaos exposure.
Rodríguez hittable during entries.
Round 1: Very dangerous for Rodríguez.
If Borjas lands clean during early entries, KO possible.
Round 2–3: Rodríguez pressure and grappling equity increase if he survives.
Key Variable: Does Rodríguez secure early control before absorbing clean counters?
Kevin Borjas 55% - Imanol Rodríguez 45%
Most likely outcome:
Kevin Borjas by KO/TKO or decision
Volatility Score: 0.68
High volatility fight — outside official pick threshold.
Classification: Pass / Lean only.
Early takedown within first 3 minutes
Clinch pressure + scramble-heavy sequences
Dragging Borjas into sustained grappling exchanges
Estimated submission/control upset equity: ~32%
This is archetypal flyweight volatility:
Explosive striker vs aggressive grappler
Entry safety determines everything
Slight lean toward Borjas due to early chaos advantage, but not confident enough for official pick.


Santiago Luna
Technical striker with measured pacing and decent range control. Prefers clean boxing exchanges over chaotic brawls. Tends to fight at a moderate tempo; not a high-pressure cage cutter. Limited evidence of elite-level grappling defense against persistent wrestlers.
Angel Pacheco
Pressure-oriented fighter who looks to close distance quickly and mix takedowns with heavy hooks. More aggressive, higher urgency early, and willing to fight in scrambles. Defensive striking can be porous when overextending.
If Pacheco cuts the cage effectively and forces clinch exchanges, his pressure validates.
If he walks forward linearly without angle changes → downgrade via PMTR.
Early tape suggests partial validation, not elite-level trapping.
Pacheco’s takedown entries are occasionally linear.
If Luna maintains distance and punishes level changes with counters → Predictive Counterstrike Risk (PCR) applies.
If Luna has measurable range advantage and maintains jab authority, RCE applies +5% structural equity.
This is a critical tactical variable.
If Pacheco secures 30+ second control segments without absorbing damage, judging optics shift strongly toward him.
If Luna lands visibly cleaner shots at range, damage > control.
Pacheco’s pressure style risks output drop after R1 if wrestling-heavy.
If CSI penalty triggers, R2–3 lean toward Luna’s steadier pace.
If fight becomes wild, the more durable and defensively responsible fighter gains equity.
Luna appears slightly cleaner defensively.
Round 1: Pacheco pushes pace, attempts takedowns.
Round 2: If control not established early, Luna’s range and volume start accumulating.
Round 3: Cardio and cleaner optics favor Luna if fight remains standing.
Key variable: Can Pacheco trap and sustain clinch control in first 5 minutes?
Santiago Luna 61% - Angel Pacheco 39%
Most likely outcome:
Santiago Luna by decision
Volatility Score: 0.56
Borderline official pick threshold. Slightly elevated due to wrestling variance.
Classification: Lean to low-confidence official depending on market line.
Early takedown within first 2–3 minutes
Sustained top control and positional dominance
Forcing Luna to fight off back foot entire fight
Estimated upset equity: ~35% (mostly decision-based)
This is a classic:
Range striker vs forward-pressure grappler.
If Pacheco’s entries are layered and cage-cutting validated → fight flips.
If not → Luna wins rounds with cleaner distance striking.
Slight structural lean toward Luna, but not high-confidence.