Prediction: Silva by Decision
Reality: Vallejos by Decision
Vallejos had the technical striking advantage.
Early rounds were competitive, but Silva pressured and tried to steal moments.
Underestimated Vallejos’ composure under pressure. He didn’t fold under Silva’s forward movement and stayed sharp even late.
Silva’s volume wasn’t enough to clearly win rounds. Despite walking forward, his output was less meaningful.
Judging favored cleaner, crisper shots over aggression with less accuracy.
When predicting pressure fighters like Silva, don’t overvalue forward motion unless it’s paired with effective striking or takedowns.
Boost fighters like Vallejos who maintain defensive structure under pressure and land clean counters.
Recognize that in close fights, optics (clean strikes > aggression without damage) matter more than assumed.
Prediction: Rębecki by TKO (Round 2)
Reality: Duncan by Decision
Rębecki came out aggressive and had some early success.
Fight was expected to be physical and gritty.
Massive underestimation of Duncan’s durability and improvement. He survived early pressure and made Rębecki look predictable.
Rębecki faded fast. Cardio was overestimated — Duncan’s wrestling defense and pressure wore him down.
Duncan used superior tactics. He slowed the pace and adjusted to nullify Rębecki’s bursty style.
Penalize fighters like Rębecki who rely heavily on early explosion without proven 3-round pacing.
Reward fighters like Duncan who show consistent cardio and have improved defensive wrestling.
When an explosive striker fails to hurt an opponent early, their win probability should drop sharply in live prediction modeling.
Do not overvalue pressure or aggression without effective control or clean damage.
Reevaluate “explosive but inefficient” fighters (Rębecki-type) who haven’t shown depth in longer fights.
Respect durability and composure under pressure — Duncan and Vallejos both benefited from it.